Compress any image to 120KB or less automatically. For profile photos, document uploads and web images where 100KB is too tight but full quality is not required.
Drop your JPEG or PNG. At 120KB, photos up to 700×700 pixels compress with high quality. Original size and dimensions shown.
The binary search finds the highest JPEG quality at or under 120KB. Results are consistently high quality for all standard photo formats at this budget.
Review before/after quality and download.
A 500×500 pixel profile photo at 120KB achieves approximately JPEG quality 80–88. A 800×600 pixel web banner at 120KB achieves quality 68–76. Both are excellent for web and document purposes. 120KB represents a very good balance of quality and file size for most web images.
Yes — LinkedIn recommends profile photos of 400×400 pixels at a maximum of 8MB, so 120KB is well within the limit and small enough for fast loading. At 400×400 pixels, 120KB achieves JPEG quality 84–92, giving an excellent, professional-looking profile photo.
No — pixel dimensions are unchanged. The tool only reduces JPEG quality to meet the 120KB limit. For portals that require both a specific file size and specific pixel dimensions, resize your image to the required size first, then compress here.
Yes — 120KB is a practical size for WordPress blog images displayed at medium sizes (400–600 pixels wide). WordPress also applies its own compression on upload, so starting at 120KB ensures the stored image remains visually good after WordPress processing. For large hero images displayed at full width, consider 200–300KB.
For a 800×600 pixel web image, 120KB achieves approximately JPEG quality 76–84 and 200KB achieves quality 82–90. The difference is visible on close inspection but barely noticeable at normal web viewing distances. Use 120KB when your portal enforces it; use 200KB when you have the choice and want marginally better quality.
